Jump to content

Disclaimer



Photo
- - - - -

Random House Taking Unagented Subs


  • Please log in to reply
83 replies to this topic

#81 Cheryl B. Dale

Cheryl B. Dale

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,193 posts
  • Literary Status:published, in-between agents
  • LocationUS Southeast
  • Publishing Experience:Category, ebooks, mystery

Posted 12 March 2013 - 05:59 PM

Update:

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/56316-random-house-modifies-contracts-for-its-digital-imprints.html

 

Random House is either trying to please the crowds or couldn't keep pretending that contract wasn't terrible. Either way, happy to see the change.

 

M.W

I think they hoped it would all be swept under the radar.



#82 AMK

AMK

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 572 posts
  • Literary Status:emerging
  • LocationUS Southeast
  • Publishing Experience:nada...working on it

Posted 12 March 2013 - 08:32 PM

Wow. I can't believe Random House is doing this. That stinks.



#83 KrystenH

KrystenH

    Lady of the Dragons

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Literary Status:just starting, emerging, unagented
  • LocationCanada

Posted 12 March 2013 - 08:34 PM

I still don't trust these imprints...

#84 Midnight Whimsy

Midnight Whimsy

    Indie Author

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,025 posts
  • Literary Status:self-published
  • LocationCanada
  • Publishing Experience:Self-published, Amazon Top 100 YA Author

Posted 13 March 2013 - 12:55 PM

I'm not really sure what to think either. The new contract options sound fine, but I have to question their integrity... :/

 

M.W






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users